Europe and the geopolitics of AGI
The need for a preparedness plan
ResearchPublished Dec 16, 2025
This report examines the geopolitical implications of the emergence of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for Europe. It finds that Europe currently lacks sufficient strategic awareness and competitive positioning to navigate this transition. The report proposes an authoritative AGI Preparedness Report to outline a coherent European agenda for safety, security, and prosperity.
The need for a preparedness plan
ResearchPublished Dec 16, 2025
Artificial general intelligence (AGI) has moved from speculation to the centre of political debate. This report examines arguments that AGI could emerge in the near future and considers what such a development would mean for Europe. It adopts a working definition of AGI as AI systems that match or exceed humans at most economically useful cognitive work. On this definition, empirical trends and expert judgement suggest that it is plausible that AGI could emerge between 2030 and 2040 or even earlier, though uncertainty remains substantial. The emergence of such systems could reshape economic growth, military capabilities and international stability, while intensifying competitive and coercive dynamics among nations. Yet Europe currently lacks sufficient strategic awareness of frontier AI progress, lags on key measures of competitive positioning and holds only limited leverage in the AI value chain. Existing EU and Member State strategies remain fragmented and do not match the potential stakes. This report therefore proposes an authoritative AGI Preparedness Report led by a figure with exceptional political authority and technical credibility, supported by a world class team, with the mandate to outline a coherent European agenda for prosperity, security and stable international governance in a possible AGI era.
The President of the European Commission should commission an 'AGI Preparedness Report' addressing three questions:
The Report should be spearheaded by a lead author with both strong technical credibility and the highest political standing. The lead author should be afforded:
The Report should be technically rigorous and based on the best available evidence, while also taking an anticipatory stance and being explicit about uncertainty.
The Report should be delivered quickly, ideally within six months, to reflect that AGI may be near and to maximise the available time for implementation.
The Report should be presented to the European Council at a dedicated event, to enable a parallel diplomatic process and high-level endorsements.
This research was independently initiated and conducted jointly by RAND Europe, the Center on AI, Security, and Technology within RAND Global and Emerging Risks, and the Centre for Future Generations using income from operations and gifts and grants from philanthropic supporters.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.